Recently someone commented on Facebook how Mumbai was ranked as one of the Dirtiest Cities and how true this fact was. This got one my friend totally upset as this person was a so called out-of-townee who was earning his keep in the city. According to him this person was totally ungrateful for what the city was providing him with.
One thing I will agree is that Mumbai sure is dirty. But I have seen places that are more filthier than this city. Secondly, this city is dirty because we let it be dirtied, and dirty it too. How many of us haven't used the city's roads and streets as our own personal garbage bins and spit bowls and open-air toilets (of course not this one). We ourselves dirty the city and then we ourselves scoff our noses up at the smell and grime that we see all over. The city maybe polluted but I know of many other cities that are more polluted. A recent trip to Juhu beach left me shocked to see the amount of garbage and litter lying all over the beach. The people there were from all walks of life, Mumbaikars, non-Mumbaikars, residents and tourists, rich and poor. The beach was polluted because people just threw things everywhere, except in the garbage bins, and there were no one to clean the mess. Think about whats going to happen with the fast approaching Ganesh festival.
Mumbai provides over 40% of the country's income in the form of taxes and receives a very meager amount of benefits in returns. It provides job, shelter and education, bread and butter to people not only from Maharashtra but from all over the country and possibly the world. But still gets back very little in return. I know of a very famous actor who along with his family lives in the city and earns his living here but goes ahead and promotes a state where he hasn't lived in at all.
For me Mumbai is always the best city in the world. It's my origin, the place where I was born, where I learned so many valuable lessons, made friends, formed bonds, found love and discovered myself. Mumbai will always be a part of me. And I will try and do my best to make this city a better place to live in.
Friday, June 28, 2013
Don't Mess with Nature
Many may view the floods and devastation in Uttarakhand as The Gods' punishment for our wicked ways or the result of moving an ancient idol, because of their beliefs and faith, for me this calamity is Nature's way of telling us "You mess with me and there will be a price to be paid." For me this not necessarily the great floods of Noah. For me this floods exposes our greediness, our lack of preparedness to face calamities. While we pray for the safety of those affected and those stranded and for the brave hearts who risk their lives to provide help and bring people to safety, we see the wickedness of man rear its ugly head, taking advantage of the situation. It is sad to see their plight as they face the fury of nature and wickedness together.
Somehow we never ever seem to learn from any of these calamities. I see the rampant destruction of mangroves, our protection from the fury of the sea. I see encroachment and reclamation of land from the sea and lack of clearing of rivers and nallas and drains and not to forget pollution. It makes me wonder how prepared are we for another 26/7, for another cloud burst. IT shows the laziness and mass corruption of the people who duty it is to see to it these calamities are avoided.
I can just prey that this devastation hopefully never ever happens again and people do not have to face sucha a situation.
Somehow we never ever seem to learn from any of these calamities. I see the rampant destruction of mangroves, our protection from the fury of the sea. I see encroachment and reclamation of land from the sea and lack of clearing of rivers and nallas and drains and not to forget pollution. It makes me wonder how prepared are we for another 26/7, for another cloud burst. IT shows the laziness and mass corruption of the people who duty it is to see to it these calamities are avoided.
I can just prey that this devastation hopefully never ever happens again and people do not have to face sucha a situation.
Saturday, June 22, 2013
Humility
Last Sunday, my mom and aunt were watching a serial where the mother of the groom, on the instigation of her meddling aunt (total Shashikala mode), suggested that the bride's father should wash the feet of the groom according to some ancient obscure tradition (what I felt). And you should have seen the expression on all the character's face as if they were humiliated and insulted, as if they were asked to wash an unmentionable body part. Of course, as with all Hindi shows this was about Household politics, it seemed quite outdated though.
We have seen Christ wash the feet of his disciples and encourage us that in order to be first we need to humble ourselves and be last. The Church and the Pope talk about Servant Leadership, in order to be a leader we need to be the servant of all. Even in the Mahabharta Krishna became the driver to Arjun's chariot during the war. Here we have two very great human beings, Gods, who humbled themselves and served others. This made the thought of that scene from the show absurd.
Maybe my train of thoughts drifted from the core of that scene. But somehow that scene led me think about this.
We have seen Christ wash the feet of his disciples and encourage us that in order to be first we need to humble ourselves and be last. The Church and the Pope talk about Servant Leadership, in order to be a leader we need to be the servant of all. Even in the Mahabharta Krishna became the driver to Arjun's chariot during the war. Here we have two very great human beings, Gods, who humbled themselves and served others. This made the thought of that scene from the show absurd.
Maybe my train of thoughts drifted from the core of that scene. But somehow that scene led me think about this.
The Core of Elearning
"What do you think is the Core of Elearning?" asked my interviewer, calmly as he sat across me in the meeting room. After a few seconds of thinking, I nervously (as I alway find myself during an interview) stated that according to me, the core of elearning is making learning effective and efficient. It is delivering content in a manner that it would be understood and applied in an effective manner. He calmly looked at me and said that was not the core of elearning and encouraged me to take a couple of seconds to think about the question. So here I sat and racked my brains about the possible answer, after all I wanted to create a good impression about my knowledge (somehow I always underestimate my ability). And then I slowly, and not so confidently, stated that it was how well we delivered and how effective we could make learning for the audience. Yet my interviewer state that it was not the core of elearning. My answer spoke about the mean but not the core. He said that the core of elearning was "Learning".
Later, as I walked back dejectedly from the interview (obviously I knew that I had blown the so called opportunity), I kept thinking what the hell did he mean that the core of elearning was learning, after all all the Gagnes, Blooms, Merills, Kellers, Kirkpatricks, spoke about how to make the delivery of learning effective (or at least that was what I thought). So what was he talking about. And so my mind refused to see it any other way, at least for the next couple of minutes (or hours, or days). But as I let this thought marinate in my head the more I started to see it from my interviewer's point of view. And so I put forth this question to my peers and friends to see if they could help shed some light on this topic, I felt they were better equipped than I was on this topic :).
And as I kept reading each response and liking each of them, I realized the answer (as usual) was staring at me in the face. Yeah, all the ID theories spoke about effective delivery of elearning and making learning meaningful and fun but at the center of all this is indeed learning. We design content in order to aide learning. We create WBTs, CBTs, ILTs, SGs, FGs, in order to help learners to learn, to understand new content, to form new neurological connections, and in the end effectively apply what they have learned. An elearning is successful only when the learn is able to learn and understand the content and apply what they have learned.
Yes, all the ID theories talk about making learning effective, an insight into the psyche of a learner, and provide us with guidelines on how to go about developing content, but in the end in the center of all this learning. Our whole world (I mean an ID's world) revolves around learning (of course it is already present in the industry name). Whether it is about the transfer of knowledge and information, learning new processes or being on-boarded into a new company, our job is to facilitate learning and make it more effective. No matter what and who our learners are, we look towards help them to learn new information and gain better knowledge.
So I found the answer that I was looking for. So to all the respondents, and of course to my interviewer, I thank you for opening up my mind and helping to look at my chosen career path in a light that I had (unfortunately) not considered in the past. Can't say I gained enlightenment, but I know I gained a lot of helpful information and came pretty close.
Later, as I walked back dejectedly from the interview (obviously I knew that I had blown the so called opportunity), I kept thinking what the hell did he mean that the core of elearning was learning, after all all the Gagnes, Blooms, Merills, Kellers, Kirkpatricks, spoke about how to make the delivery of learning effective (or at least that was what I thought). So what was he talking about. And so my mind refused to see it any other way, at least for the next couple of minutes (or hours, or days). But as I let this thought marinate in my head the more I started to see it from my interviewer's point of view. And so I put forth this question to my peers and friends to see if they could help shed some light on this topic, I felt they were better equipped than I was on this topic :).
And as I kept reading each response and liking each of them, I realized the answer (as usual) was staring at me in the face. Yeah, all the ID theories spoke about effective delivery of elearning and making learning meaningful and fun but at the center of all this is indeed learning. We design content in order to aide learning. We create WBTs, CBTs, ILTs, SGs, FGs, in order to help learners to learn, to understand new content, to form new neurological connections, and in the end effectively apply what they have learned. An elearning is successful only when the learn is able to learn and understand the content and apply what they have learned.
Yes, all the ID theories talk about making learning effective, an insight into the psyche of a learner, and provide us with guidelines on how to go about developing content, but in the end in the center of all this learning. Our whole world (I mean an ID's world) revolves around learning (of course it is already present in the industry name). Whether it is about the transfer of knowledge and information, learning new processes or being on-boarded into a new company, our job is to facilitate learning and make it more effective. No matter what and who our learners are, we look towards help them to learn new information and gain better knowledge.
So I found the answer that I was looking for. So to all the respondents, and of course to my interviewer, I thank you for opening up my mind and helping to look at my chosen career path in a light that I had (unfortunately) not considered in the past. Can't say I gained enlightenment, but I know I gained a lot of helpful information and came pretty close.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
